TAM YUK CHING AND OTHERS V. HOOSENALLY & NEO (A FIRM)

[2026] HKCFI 2498 Court of First Instance 29 April 2026 • HCA1511/2020 • 6 min read
4 cases cited (0 HK, 4 foreign)

Practice Areas

Professional Discipline & Regulation

Judges (1)

Gary CC Lam Coram

Counsel (4)

Kok & Ha Firm NEO Solicitors LLP Firm Prisca Cheung Counsel Plaintiff Ryan Chan Counsel Defendant

Parties (5)

Blissful Voice Limited Plaintiff Take Point Investment Holdings Limited Plaintiff Wong & Poon Solicitors (a firm) Defendant Hoosenally & Neo (A Firm) Defendant Tam Yuk Ching Plaintiff

Cases Cited (4)

UK (1)
[2012] EWHC 91
HK (3)
[2014] 4 HKLRD 44 [2015] 5 HKC 329 [2026] HKCFI 122

Related cases

Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

[2026] HKCFI 122 HKCFI
TAM YUK CHING AND OTHERS V. HOOSENALLY & NEO (A FIRM)
6 January 2026
[2026] HKDC 754 HKDC
LEE WOON PING V. SMART DRAGON ASIA PACIFIC LTD
28 April 2026
[2026] HKCFI 613 HKCFI
CHENG CHING FONG V. TING SHUK KAY PEGGY, EXECUTRIX OF THE WILL OF TING SOK HANG, DECEASED
29 January 2026
[2025] HKCA 1069 HKCA
CHOW FRANK, FORMERLY KNOWN AS ZHOU XINGFANG V. YUEN HOI PO
12 December 2025
[2025] HKCFI 1454 HKCFI
RE YUEN HOI PO
3 April 2025
[2025] HKCA 42 HKCA
HIGH ROUTE LTD V. WONG CHUNG KAI
6 January 2025

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2026] HKCFI 2498)