RAHMAN MD MIZANUR V. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE

[2026] HKCA 32 Court of Appeal 9 February 2026 • CACV916/2025 • 4 min read
3 cases cited (0 HK, 3 foreign)

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Source: [2026] HKCA 32, Court of Appeal, decided 9 February 2026. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (2)

Parties (3)

Case Significance

Rahman Md Mizanur v Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCA 32 was an appeal from the Court of First Instance's refusal of a judicial review application at [2025] HKCFI 4764. The Court of Appeal held that "the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs," referring to [2018] HKCA 524 and [2019] HKCA 1022.

Summary

A Bangladeshi national appealed against the refusal of leave to apply for judicial review of the Board's decision dismissing his non-refoulement claim. The applicant acted in person. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal for lack of merit.

What was the outcome of Rahman Md Mizanur v Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCA 32?

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding that "the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs," and upheld the Court of First Instance's earlier refusal of the judicial review application recorded at [2025] HKCFI 4764.

Cases Cited (3)

HK (3)
[2018] HKCA 524 [2019] HKCA 1022 [2025] HKCFI 4764

Related cases

Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2026] HKCA 32)