REGMI KRISHNA PRASAD V. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD/ NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE

[2026] HKCA 25 Court of Appeal 27 January 2026 • CACV914/2025 • 4 min read
4 cases cited (0 HK, 4 foreign)

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Source: [2026] HKCA 25, Court of Appeal, decided 27 January 2026. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (2)

Parties (3)

Case Significance

In Regmi Krishna Prasad v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCA 25, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal with no order as to costs, holding that "the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs." The decision followed the earlier ruling in Regmi Krishna Prasad v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2025] HKCFI 4710, and drew on the reasoning applied in Re Pante Luisa Tuppil [2025] HKCA 1123.

Summary

A Nepalese national appealed against the refusal of leave to apply for judicial review of the Board's decision dismissing his non-refoulement claim. The applicant acted in person. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no viable grounds.

What did the Court of Appeal decide in Regmi Krishna Prasad v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCA 25?

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal with no order as to costs, holding that "the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs," after considering the Court of First Instance's decision in the same non-refoulement matter, [2025] HKCFI 4710.

Cases Cited (4)

HK (4)
[2018] HKCA 524 [2019] HKCA 1022 [2025] HKCA 1123 [2025] HKCFI 4710

Related cases

Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2026] HKCA 25)