JOMPILLA ETHEL GONZALES V. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE
Outcome
Leave to appeal refusedleave to apply for judicial review was refused by the Judge on 2 September 2025. Details of the Judge’s reasons for refusing to grant leave can be found in the CALL-1 Form.
Source: [2026] HKCA 243, Court of Appeal, decided 27 February 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Judges (2)
Case Significance
Jompilla Ethel Gonzales v Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCA 243 is a Court of Appeal decision dated 27 February 2026 concerning leave to apply for judicial review, following on from the applicant's related claim in Jompilla Ethel Gonzales v Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2025] HKCFI 3960. The court recorded that "leave to apply for judicial review was refused by the Judge on 2 September 2025. Details of the Judge's reasons for refusing to grant leave can be found in the CALL-1 Form." No taxonomy area or catchword classification is recorded for this entry.
What did the Court of Appeal record in Jompilla Ethel Gonzales v Torture Claims Appeal Board [2026] HKCA 243?
In Jompilla Ethel Gonzales v Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCA 243, the court noted that leave to apply for judicial review was refused by the Judge, with reasons recorded in the CALL-1 Form, following the earlier claim in [2025] HKCFI 3960.
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2026] HKCA 243)