林見陽祖 (司理人: 林春樹,林盛謙) V. 林裕邦
1 cases cited
(0 HK, 1 foreign)
Judges (1)
Summary
The applicant (a tso/ancestral trust) sought to enforce a judgment for possession of rural land against the respondent. The respondent applied to set aside the judgment, claiming he was not properly notified of the hearing. The court dismissed the set-aside application, finding the respondent had been duly notified and his explanations for non-attendance were not credible.
Statutes Cited
Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)
Town Planning Ordinance (Cap 131)
Cases Cited (1)
HK (1)
[2002] 2 HKLRD 705
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2026] HKCFI 3872 HKCFI
RE GREAT MEGA DESIGN & BUILD LTD
7 July 2026
[2026] HKCFI 2297 HKCFI
GERMAN POOL GROUP CO LTD AND OTHERS V. DYSON TECHNOLOGY LTD AND ANOTHER
19 May 2026
[2026] HKDC 264 HKDC
CISSIE SUEN MIU LING, ALSO KNOWN AS SUEN MIU LING CISSIE V. KONG YUEN LING AND ANOTHER
13 February 2026
[2025] HKCFI 6475 HKCFI
GERMAN POOL GROUP CO LTD AND OTHERS V. DYSON TECHNOLOGY LTD AND ANOTHER
29 December 2025
[2025] HKDC 1760 HKDC
CHU LAI MAN (ALSO KNOWN AS JERMAN LAI MAN CHU) V. ELLIOT JAMES & TYNDAL LTD
22 October 2025
[2025] HKCFI 2977 HKCFI
HONGKONG YEEWOTONG VENTUREPHARM TECHNOLOGY GROUPS LTD V. CHINA BEIJING TONG REN TANG GROUP CO., LTD. AND ANOTHER
10 July 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2025] HKLdT 65)