LEE LAM HOI V. 京寶大廈業主立案法團
2 cases cited
(0 HK, 2 foreign)
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (1)
Summary
The respondent incorporated owners of King Po Mansion sought leave to appeal against the Lands Tribunal's judgment on the interpretation of the Deed of Mutual Covenant regarding calculation of maintenance contribution shares. The dispute was whether expenses should be divided by 76 or 110 units. The court dismissed the leave to appeal application, finding no reasonable prospect of success.
Statutes Cited
Building Management Ordinance
s 22(2)
Cases Cited (2)
HK (2)
(1999) 2 HKCFAR 279 [2009] 4 HKLRD 125
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2024] HKCFI 231 HKCFI
TOYOTA BOSHOKU EUROPE N.V. V. KINGSVILLE (HK) ENTERPRISES LTD AND OTHERS
23 January 2024
[2025] HKCA 893 HKCA
TSANG CHI SHING RAYMOND V. CHINA INTERNATIONAL FINANCE HOLDINGS LTD AND ANOTHER
29 September 2025
[2025] HKFC 158 HKFC
HKY V. CKH BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM CMKG
15 August 2025
[2025] HKCA 617 HKCA
WONG LAM WEI HOLLY V. HOSPITAL AUTHORITY
4 July 2025
[2025] HKCFI 2300 HKCFI
BANK OF CHINA (HONG KONG) LTD V. PERPETUAL WEALTH (HONG KONG) LTD AND OTHERS
30 May 2025
[2025] HKCA 446 HKCA
KWAN KWAI LIN AND ANOTHER V. YEUNG ON KI
22 May 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2025] HKLdT 1)