LCTD V. CKMC
7 cases cited
(0 HK, 7 foreign)
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Parties (2)
Summary
The petitioner husband applied for permission to adduce additional expert evidence on business valuation in ancillary relief proceedings described as a big money case. The wife opposed, arguing the application was too late and would delay proceedings. The court dismissed the application, finding it was not in the interests of justice to allow additional expert evidence at that stage, with costs to the wife.
Statutes Cited
Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)
Cases Cited (7)
UK (4)
[2000] 1 WLR 1382 [2002] 1 WLR 210 [2003] EWCA Civ 1240 [2007] EWHC 136
HK (3)
[2006] HKFLR 121 [2014] 3 HKLRD 56 [2021] HKCA 1229
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2024] HKFC 156 HKFC
LCTD V. CKMC
28 August 2024
[2024] HKFC 89 HKFC
LCTD V. CKMC
29 April 2024
[2024] HKFC 129 HKFC
LCTD V. CKMC
21 June 2024
[2024] HKFC 98 HKFC
LCTD V. CKMC
7 May 2024
[2024] HKFC 31 HKFC
LCTD V. CKMC
16 February 2024
[2025] HKCFA 20 HKCFA
HKSAR V. MAK KWONG YIU, CHAN LAI YEE, WONG SHUK ON, LEE YICK MING
5 November 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2025] HKFC 173)