CHOW PO TAI V. CHEN CAO LIYAN AND ANOTHER

[2025] HKCFI 5016 Court of First Instance 14 October 2025 • HCA2379/2024 • 17 min read

8 cases cited (0 HK, 8 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Outcome

Application refused

I refused the application as I was not satisfied that there was any extreme urgency which required the making of an “urgent temporary stop-gap measure” and the circumstances were such that the court has to do practical justice on the balance of fairness

Source: [2025] HKCFI 5016, Court of First Instance, decided 14 October 2025. Read directly from the judgment.

Practice Areas

Theft, Fraud & Dishonesty

Judges (1)

Grace Chow Coram

Counsel (5)

James P. Y. Lam & Co Firm Tang, Wong & Chow Firm Anson Wong Yu Yat Counsel Defendant Jonathan Ip Counsel Defendant Kevin Hon Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (3)

Bao Qian Zhenwei Defendant Chen Cao Liyan Defendant Chow Po Tai Plaintiff

Cases Cited (8)

HK (8)

[2014] 3 HKLRD 642 [2018] HKCA 409 [2020] HKCA 351 [2021] 3 HKC 167 [2021] HKCFI 2425 [2023] HKCFI 138 [2023] HKCFI 2124 [2025] HKCFI 938

Cited By (1)

[2026] HKCFI 1084

CHOW PO TAI V. CHEN CAO LIYAN AND ANOTHER

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 1 later judgment. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

[2026] HKCFI 1084 Court of First Instance

26 February 2026