RAI TIKA KUMARI V. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE
Judges (2)
Case Significance
Rai Tika Kumari v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2025] HKCA 78 is a Court of Appeal decision from 2025 addressing the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, including section 8, in a non-refoulement claim. It follows the Court of First Instance's earlier ruling in the same matter, Rai Tika Kumari v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2024] HKCFI 2279. Later Court of First Instance decisions, such as Hussain Manzar v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCFI 165, reference this appeal.
Summary
Rai Tika Kumari, a Nepalese national, appealed against the refusal of leave to judicially review the dismissal of her non-refoulement claim. The Court found no errors in the Judge's assessment. The appeal was dismissed.
What area of law does Rai Tika Kumari v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office address ([2025] HKCA 78)?
Rai Tika Kumari v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2025] HKCA 78 is a Court of Appeal ruling touching on the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, including section 8, decided in the non-refoulement claims context in 2025.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (3)
Cited By (6)
Citation influence
HKLII records this judgment as cited by 4 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2025] HKCA 78)