MG CHARTER LTD V. BEIJING CAISSA INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL SERVICE CO, LTD

[2025] HKCA 1129 Court of Appeal 16 December 2025 • CACV2/2023 • 32 min read

15 cases cited (0 HK, 15 foreign)

Outcome

Appeal allowed

the appeal is allowed.

Source: [2025] HKCA 1129, Court of Appeal, decided 16 December 2025. Read directly from the judgment.

Practice Areas

Contract & Commercial Disputes

Judges (3)

Cheung Coram Chow Coram Chu Coram

Counsel (6)

Holman Fenwick Willan Firm Johnson Stokes & Master Firm Christopher Chain Counsel Plaintiff Jasmine Cheung Counsel Plaintiff Jonathan Chang Counsel Defendant Sheena Wong Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

Beijing Caissa International Travel Service Co, Ltd Defendant Mg Charter Limited Plaintiff

Case Significance

MG CHARTER LTD V. BEIJING CAISSA INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL SERVICE CO, LTD [2025] HKCA 1129 was a contract and commercial dispute in which the Court of Appeal drew on EMINENT INVESTMENTS (ASIA PACIFIC) LIMITED V. DIO CORPORATION [2020] HKCFA 38. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, holding: "the appeal is allowed."

Summary

Non-refoulement claimant appealed against the refusal of leave for judicial review of the Board's decision. The applicant raised only fact-specific allegations. The appeal was dismissed.

What did the Court of Appeal decide in MG Charter Ltd v. Beijing Caissa International Travel Service Co, Ltd [2025] HKCA 1129?

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, stating simply "the appeal is allowed," in a contract and commercial dispute that drew on the Court of Final Appeal's earlier reasoning in Eminent Investments (Asia Pacific) Limited v. Dio Corporation [2020] HKCFA 38.