ROE INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER V. UNIONIX DEVELOPMENT LTD

[2000] HKCFA 20 Court of Final Appeal 21 February 2000 • FACV14/1999 • 22 min read

Outcome

Application dismissed

the writ was dismissed with costs to Roe.

Source: [2000] HKCFA 20, Court of Final Appeal, decided 21 February 2000. Read directly from the judgment.

Practice Areas

Company & Shareholder Disputes

Judges (4)

Bokhary Coram Court: Chief Justice Li Coram Litton PJ Mr Justice Ching Coram Lord Hoffmann Coram

Counsel (5)

Anderson Chow Counsel Respondent Daniel R Fung Counsel Respondent Edward K S Chan Counsel Unknown Horace Y.L. Wong Counsel Unknown Tsang & Loong) Counsel Appellant

Parties (5)

Kowloon Development Company Limited Appellant Roe Investment Limited Appellant Roe Investment Ltd Appellant Unionix Development Limited Respondent Unionix Development Ltd Respondent

Statutes Cited

Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 1 later judgment. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

[2017] HKCFI 2198 Court of First Instance

11 December 2017

Related cases

Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

[1999] HKCFA 32 HKCFA

ROE INVESTMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER V. UNIONIX DEVELOPMENT LTD.

28 June 1999

[1999] HKCFA 66 HKCFA

ROE INVESTMENT LTD. V. PRINCE GOOD LTD. AND ANOTHER

28 June 1999

[2000] HKCFA 43 HKCFA

SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE OTHERS V. CHAN WAH AND OTHERS

22 December 2000

[2000] HKCFA 25 HKCFA

POON HAU KEI V. HSIN CHEONG CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. AND OTHERS

3 March 2000

[1999] HKCFA 11 HKCFA

POON HAU KEI V. HSIN CHEONG CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. AND ANOTHERS

15 December 1999

[1999] HKCFA 38 HKCFA

JUMBO KING LTD V. FAITHFUL PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS

2 December 1999

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2000] HKCFA 20)